In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Since I have received four emails within the last two days on the SR
issue, I opt to update my review to elaborate my observations on the
Pentax latest SR system:-
http://www.geocities.com/ricehigh/K100D/RiceHighs_Pentax_K100D_Full_Review.html
Click on the "SR Comments" to see, I have tried to write in (much) more
details for what I know and experienced.
p.s. Warning: If you want to see those typical comparison pairs of
shots which "prove" how SR works with "On" and "Off" comparisons, which
have being seen everywhere on the net and in numerious magazine tests,
you will probably be greatly disappointed. So, please don't read on if
you really expect for those things or alike.
p.s.2: I have made short comments about the drawback of Canon and
Nikon's IS/VR system, too.
RiceHigh
http://www.geocities.com/ricehigh

RiceHigh

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

: "ian" <where@remyposts.com> writes:
element
:
: Having any optics at all means a less than perfectly straight light path.
: That was the whole point, I thought.
nope.


Ian

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Pinhole anyone!
Quoting well out of context.
--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk


Peter Chant

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

I had assumed that was what he "ment" to say.


Advocate

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Ah, I see said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.... I,
too misinterpreted what your point was.
Thanks for clarifying.
--
john mcwilliams


John McWilliams

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

"ian" <where@remyposts.com> writes:
Having any optics at all means a less than perfectly straight light path.
That was the whole point, I thought.


Paul Rubin

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

:
:
: Paying extra money for a lens with IS would be a waste...correct? A
: bazillion test photos can't be wrong.
If anything IS lenses would take slightly worse photos. Having one element
moving about is going to mean a less than perfectly straight light path.
Unless you are using a slow shutter speed IS is not necessary. Given that
70-200 is portrait focal length territory IS still isn't that great cos your
human subjects will show movement at slow shutter speeds and IS only
compensates for camera movement.


Ian

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Well der!!!! Naturally the tests I am referring to were conducted at
shutter speeds were the IS would have no discernible effect with regard to
movement.... I was purely testing the image quality of the optics. (both
IS on and off just to make sure)


POTD.com.au

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Many people have taken pictures without realizing that their
cameras hadn't been loaded with film. Half a bazillion test photos
might have been taken without realizing that IS can be turned on or
OFF. A bazillion photographers make similar mistakes every year!


ASAAR

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

Paying extra money for a lens with IS would be a waste...correct? A
bazillion test photos can't be wrong.


Advocate

Re: In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!

POTD.com.au ??:
Well EVERY lens is a handful of errors then, as no single element is
perfect..... nor are all elements the same.... so it could well be that a
Canon/Nikon lens with IS is still a truck load better than another
manufacture's lens without, because the Canon/Nikon offerings are better
optically to begin with.
Personally I owned two Canon 70-200 2.8 L lenses, one with IS and one
without. I shot a bazillion tests with those lenses and there was no, zero,
nada, zilch perceivable difference in the images they produced.


POTD.com.au

Content - In-depth K100D SR Test / Review!!
Found 13 post(s). Page 1 of 2
| 1 | 2 |










 
Kidney Pain Symptoms - Find A Dentist - Ideal Print Management For Family - House For Sale Chennai - Croatian Property For Sale
Photoshop questions