Re: What is your lightweight SLR travel kit? Peter, That wasn't always the case. The Spotmatic bodies were not especially compact, and when Pentax belatedly changed to the K bayonet mount the camera bodies were comparatively large. Olympus changed all that with the OM System, and Pentax had to respond. With market share already way down because of their tardiness in changing to bayonet mount, Pentax desperately needed a light, compact competitor to the superb OM series. The result was the ME, MX and the SMC Pentax-M lenses. The MX was a jewel of a camera; a strong competitor to the OM-1 and genuinely built to pro standards. But the ME? It might have been compact but it certainly wasn't ergonomic. Pentax gradually got to the point where the range was mostly compact *and* ergonomic, but it took years. The LX was a big step in the right direction but there were too many bodies based on the ME/ME Super, with those silly buttons for changing shutter speed. I really enjoyed my Super A bodies (still have one somewhere!) but those buttons were very annoying. So it is only in recent years that the Pentax range of SLRs could claim to be compact and ergonomic. The recent film SLRs and the DSLRs all fit that description, but let us not forget the years when Pentax SLRs were either (or neither) compact (n)or ergonomic, not both. ;-) Tony Polson
|
|