Toss your meters, fools!

Dateline, 7-6-06
RE: Meters are useless
any photographer that shoots more than one roll of film a month (natural
light, not flash), or thirty digital "images" and still requires a meter to
gauge exposure values is not only a hack, but lazy.
i am sick of seeing article upon article...book upon book, based on the
simplest of rules.
for all of the modern conventions attributed to photography, and all of the
gadgets that can make images easier than ever, there is still no match for
knowing one's equipment, being adept at seeing full frame (whatever that
frame size is), knowing the light quality and being able to transcend that
vision to medium.
forget zones, compensation ev's, et al, just look at a perceived image, and
MAKE it. sunny 16 has worked since the dawn of photography. no new-fangled
means of trapping light have ever fooled it. in fact, it can't be fooled. it
is almost as constant as the light we surreptitiously chase!
it has never failed me, and i won't begin to tell you how many images have
been wasted by frittering with meters!
g'night,
dm

Joe mama


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Missed your birthday, by quite a bit, but happy B-Day anyway.
As for meters I started out using a plin old wide angle reflected light
meter and then found out about incident meters and eventually spot meters
and they are all different and each serves its purpose. But i guess if you
baracket a couple stops each way any of them will work.
But a lot of the photography that I do doesn't alow time to bracket. And I
own a lot of manual fixed focus Nikon lenses that I like to use because
they are much sharper than the modern zoom automatic lenses. But I still
need the meter.
JakeInHartsel


Glenn Jacobs


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

changing four batteries in the dark while carrying a tripod (including
having to remove awkward cam from tripod) was quite fun.
--
Paul (Neurotic to the bone No doubt about it)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/


Paul Heslop


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

In article <12e7lgenq93f1a7@news.supernews.com>,
Personally, I think it's way to easy for digital photographers -
whatever happened to the necessity of having three hands to change a
roll of film? Come on you digital camera manufacturers, I'm sure you
could make it a lot more difficult.


Stewy


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Actually, I'm still a puppy at 60.
More power to you, Neil.
Happy Birthday.



Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Well, I guess I could be tempted
--
Paul (Neurotic to the bone No doubt about it)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/


Paul Heslop


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Aw heck. Throw away your cameras and film, too. You really don't need either
to make photographs.


J


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Those are all things you can do in your head. Or should be able to do.


J


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

I still have two extinction meters. The filters have become near opaque, but
they are a good reminder of how we worked once.


J


Re: Toss your meters, fools!

Or better yet whether filmy digital is better than digital film.


No_name


Re: GW; was OT- Toss your meters, fools!

If only it were that simple ... the particulates are emitted by the same
processes that emit the greenhouse gasses.
More particulates attenuate solar energy transmission through the
atmosphere, but the concurrent increase in greenhouse gasses means a
higher percentage of that energy is trapped within. And the particulates
reflect energy back in as well reflecting energy away into space.
Some additional energy is reflected away, but once that energy has
passed through, a larger portion is reflected back in as it seeks to
radiate away.
The increased heat retention more than offsets the attenuation of solar
radiation ... 10% less might get through, but 25% more of what does get
through can't get back out.
It's like whitewashing the glass on a real greenhouse. It attenuates
direct solar energy, but the interior of the greenhouse still gets hot
because of the net imbalance between energy coming in, and what is
re-radiated out.
At some point it reaches a new equilibrium. But that equilibrium will
have a higher energy state (i.e. more fierce weather) and warmer average
temperatures (i.e. melting of polar ice and shifting of climate zones
northward).
And while it's reaching that new equilibrium, there may well be extreme
swings in weather patterns.


No_name


Content - Toss your meters, fools!
Found 57 post(s). Page 1 of 6
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |










 
Underwater Lights - Gifteringer - Limousinenservice Freiburg - Existenz Gründen - Hochzeits Planer Blog
Photoshop questions