Hi. 1st post here

I am getting back into shooting and developing my own film. i have a
Pentax MX with 50 f1.4 and 24 f2.8 lenses. I have started shooting
Ilford HP5 as an all around film.
i don't know if this is quite the appropriate forum but could someone
suggest a film developer for HP5? I used to shoot Kodak Tri-X and Plus
X and used Microdol-x and D-76 as general purpose developers.
Is it best to use an Ilford product for Ilford film?
Also, when i lived in L.A. a long time ago i shopped at a place called
Freestyle which is in East Hollywood. Is it still any good?
thanks for any help.
JB

Bong......James Bong


Re: Hi. 1st post here

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:55:20 -0700, "Bong......James Bong"
You may also find the Fotoimpex site:
<http://www.fotoimpex.de>
to be of interest.


Andrew Price


Re: Hi. 1st post here

In article <e798so$rps$1@dns.ktb.net>, Peter Irwin <pirwin@ktb.net>
wrote:
thanks everyone for the help and advice. i will still read and
occasionally post in this group and will also head over to the darkroom
forum.
thanks again,
JB


Bong......James Bong


Re: Hi. 1st post here

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:31:31 GMT, Al Denelsbeck <news@wadingin.net>
wrote:
[---]
That's true - I certainly wouldn't have used Rodinal with APX, when
it was still available. That being said, I was quite pleased with the
results I obtained developing HP5 in DD-X, also by Ilford.


Andrew Price


Re: Hi. 1st post here

HP5 is a great film.
I like HP5 exposed at 250 and developed in D-76 for
slightly less than the time on the Ilford chart.
Ilford ID-11 is the same for practical purposes as
Kodak D-76, it doesn't matter which one you use.
I also like HP5 as an available light film.
Expose at 800 and develop in Ilford Microphen for
the time listed for 800.
Microphen is also a pretty good developer for
normal use (expose at 400, develop for 400 times).
It is a little grainier than D-76/ID-11, but
it also seems to give a bit higher actual
sensitivity to light.
It doesn't matter. Ilford ID-11 is practically the same
thing as D-76 (the published formulas are identical)
and Ilford Perceptol is practically the same thing
as Kodak Microdol-X.
Kodak T-max developer is supposed to be a pretty
good substitute for Ilford Microphen, but they
aren't the same thing.
Have fun, and be sure visit rec.photo.darkroom.
Peter.
--
pirwin@ktb,net


Peter Irwin


Re: Hi. 1st post here

...
Far out man, I haven't seen a bong in years! (Paraphrased from the
Simpsons.) Welcome to the group.
HP5+ and FP4+ are the closest thing Ilford has to Tri-X. I use HC-110,
solution B, one-shot (five minutes at 68F). I'm thinking of changing to a
different solution, which will extend my development times so I have more
room to play--I want to lower the contrast.. FP4+ has a nine minute
developing time with solution B, and that's enough room to play, for my
purposes, anyway.
Al's right, this kind of question would best be handled over at
rec.photo.darkroom. Those guys are hardcore.
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com


Matt Clara


Re: Hi. 1st post here

Ilford would tell you so, but Microdol & D-76 should work just fine.


No_name


Re: Hi. 1st post here

JB@MI5.org:
Hello James,
You're barking up the wrong tree on this group - we're all digital
and politics here, with the occasional rant ;-)
In all seriousness, you'll probably find more answers than you can
handle regarding films and developers on rec.photo.darkroom, and they're a
knowledgable bunch of people over there. Only a handful of us here do our
own wet stuff, and among them, I'm probably on the bottom. Watch for Ken
Nadvornick and Matt Clara to chime in (I mean, about developers and stuff,
not my lack of knowledge. Though that might occur too...)
Only tried a couple of developers with HP5, and I'm waiting to try
another. I've had good results with T-Max, but I tend to push to 800
because I prefer the higher contrast.
Skip Rodinal - doesn't agree with HP5, and most especially not with a
push. Grain and contrast go almost off the scale. If you like that sort of
thing, you can call it "artistic", but I suspect that's a polite way of
saying "f**ked up"...;-)
Still waiting to try HC-110, which I got primarily to use with
Kodak's HIE Infra-red film, but time and weather haven't been cooperating
to see that yet, and I haven't tried HP5 in it either. Probably by the
weekend, though, since I have a Shoot-In image to submit and have discarded
my cheesy digital.
I've used Ilford ID-11 with Ilford Delta 400 and, I think, HP5, and
produced only average results. There certainly wasn't anything to convince
me that using the same company for developer and film was going to produce
a significant benefit.
Always remember, too, that what you want from your images may not be
what *I* want (or anyone else offering advice) - some of this will simply
be personal preference, and variations in temperature, agitation, dilution,
and timing all produce different results. Be ready to experiment a lot.
Have fun with it, though! Good luck,
- Al.
--
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net


Al Denelsbeck


Content - Hi. 1st post here
Found 7 post(s). Page 1 of 1
| 1 |










 
Bridal Shower Punch Recipe - Handbags - Low Rates Call Mexico - Student Credit Cards - Cheap Car Insurance
Photoshop questions