Re: A question for Canon FD users "Ken Rosenbaum" <kenrosenbaum@buckeye-NOGARBAGEaccess.com> writes: I have the A-1, which is somewhat broken (focus is off, eats lots of battery), FTb and T90. The FTb was manufactured sometime in the 70's, is still working, and as far as I know, the meter battery (which is not required for taking photos) is also from the 70's and still working. It is a very nice camera to use, and quite unlikely to break now, it's endured for more than 30 years, so I guess it will endure a while longer. Manual exposure is easier with the FTb than with the T90, which is my favourite for autoexposure and flash photography. How would you compare image sharpness to the FDn 50/1.4 S.S.C. or the 35-70mm/4? I haven't been exactly thrilled with the 24mm/2.8 for landscapes, images often appear a little bit too soft for my tastes. On the other hand, it is certainly worth the money I paid for it. But regardless, the FDn 50mm/1.4 S.S.C. and FDn 24mm/2.8 are the lenses I use the most, as those are the focal lengths I need the most. If there was a high-quality 24-50mm zoom lens for Canon FD that would produce nearly the same quality results as the 24mm and 50mm primes, I'd use that almost exclusively, and use the fixed 50mm only for situations that require a very large aperture. On rarer occasions I use the Zenitar 16mm fish-eye and the 135/2.5 S.C and 200/4 S.S.C lenses. The Zenitar is pretty nice if you accept the fisheyedness. The 135/2.5 S.C. is nice for some rare indoor sports shots that I take, and the 200/4 S.S.C is pretty small and light for it's focal length and useful for outdoors sports/events. Nothing spectacular, but it cost 37EUR on ebay with a skylight filter and the results are usable. Toni Nikkanen
|
|