Re: - Timing is up ---- Thanks for that, Jim. I did make an effort to cut down of the information presented. Back in the day when men were men and photography was too, this sort of info would be of interest to hard core practioners of the craft. Now days it's just a charming anachronism - except for those few of us roaming tyranosaurus rex types... ---- If one's processes are calibrated and standardized, then the only significant things that change are the individual exposures. In fact, it's not really worth noting anything unless it varies from the standard significantly. And for the most part those exceptions can be kept in one's head. (When feasibile, I do use a small voice recorder to keep track of the exposures and times of day.) ---- Yeah, I know you're right. Sleeping dogs and all. But sometimes I can't resist when I see such a truly simple thing having been needlessly turned so horrendously complex. And followed now by generations of younger photographers who have been conditioned to know of no other way. Not always, but often enough, I sense an inverse relationship between the quality and depth of a person's photographic efforts and the number of transistors in his or her camera. YM, of course, MV. Ken Ken Nadvornick
|
|