PING: William Graham

Hi Bill:
A simple question to ask you and/or any of the other pros on this NG.
Sorry if it's too boring. Anyways, I have a ton of slides taken years
ago that I want put on a CD. How do I go about doing this? There are
a lot of good pics on them, and maybe I could print some out when I
buy myself a good quality photo printer. Any suggestions?
Thanks Bill,
Helen

Helensilverburg@hotmail.com


Re: William Graham

"Max Perl" <max_perl@post11.tele.dk> wrote
Many [at least many in my price category [cheap]] take
cardboard mounted slides directly or directly with
the adapter gizzy that comes standard in the box.
--
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com


Nicholas O. Lindan


Re: William Graham

I did not know that-------thanks Max!


Helensilverburg@hotmail.com


Re: William Graham

<helensilverburg@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
Special holders exist for scanning mounted slides. If your slides are
mounted
in glass mounts then your slides will be perfectly flat. But if you use AN
glass
then a blue sky will look bit more "grainy" than scanning from clear glass
or
no glass at all.
Max


Max Perl


Re: PING: William Graham

Thanks Draco for some great advice!
Helen


Helensilverburg@hotmail.com


Re: PING: William Graham

Ms Helen,
If you want to scan multible slides at once,
use either a flatbed scanner like the Epson or
use a feeder like on the Nikon 5000. If not and
are willing to do one at a time then I suggest
the Coolscan V (5). At just under $600 you can
set the scanner to scan area at 1" x 1.5" and at
4000dpi. This gives you a full neg scan and a
file of about 58MB. With the included software
you can even restore faded color with one click
of the mouse. A preview scan is less than fifty
seconds show you can see what you'll get. The
full scan will be between one and three minutes.
A lot faster than the older scanners. Up to you and
your pocketbook will allow.
Just a suggestion. Good luck.
Draco
Getting even isn't good enough.


Draco


Re: PING: William Graham

@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
I just pulled a serious bargain a couple of months ago and got a film
scanner with a bulk loader for slides - can do about 60 at a time if
they're mounted. Drop me a line at news[at]wading[dash]in[dot]net (or see
the sig file - same thing) and we can talk about details if you like. Part
of the issue is what condition the slides are in and how much post-scan
work you want done.
Meanwhile, look at the specs for a Minolta Scan Multi II, which is
what I'd be using. Should be more than enough for all but the largest
prints.
- Al.
--
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net


Al Denelsbeck


Re: PING: William Graham

Yes, I have a lot of memory on my computer. Can't remember exactly how
much, but it's over 700 megs. Intel Pentium 4.
I've got a couple hundred slides, and I know it will take me a long
time to sort through them all, pick out the best and then scan them,
but the time is worthwhile. Ingenious idea of yours to build a light
box. I have a friend with one of those huge light boxes, so I'm going
to borrow hers. Printing company went bankrupt and was selling all it's
contents, so she bought it for a few bucks. Thanks for all your help
Bill. :^)
Helen


Helensilverburg@hotmail.com


Re: PING: William Graham

I'm not worried about getting frustrated. I enjoy learning. Your advice
on the CD is timely as I was going to ask what type I should use.
Thanks for the website and the advice.
Appreciate everyone's help, thanks guys!!
Regards,
Helen


Helensilverburg@hotmail.com


Re: PING: William Graham

"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote in >
Boy, that's good advice.....I try to send my stuff to my old friends who
would be interested in it, almost as soon as I get it scanned......Anything
to break up the monotony of just scanning and cleaning.......


William Graham


Re: PING: William Graham

One thing I forgot to tell you is that you should make sure your computer
has lots of volatile memory (RAM) before you try to do this.....I had 250
megs, and it was taking me forever, so I investigated upgrading my memory,
and I added another 500 megs for about $75. It was the best buy time-wise
that I ever made....It made a world of difference, both in
scanning/processing, and in boot-up time.
If I had 30,000 slides, I would try to find a machine with an automatic
feeder, so I wouldn't have to hand feed and process each slide.....For that
kind of volume, you might be better off finding a needy teenager that needs
a part time job, and teach them to scan slides for you. Perhaps you could
just do the triage work, and then let them do the actual scanning of what
you select. Even this takes time.....I had to build a light box that I could
view my slides against....The little ones that were available were too
small, because I wanted to use a viewer, which blew the image up to where I
could see if it had a cropable image trapped in it somewhere.....IOW,
looking at a dozen or so of them at one time just wasn't cutting it. I built
one that was 18" square, by about 6" deep, and put out lots of light....I
installed 8, 60 watt bulbs in it. Except I used these little spiral wound
fluorescents that only draw 13 watts each, but put out the equivalent of a
60 watt incandescent bulb. I set it on the table about 3 feet in front of
me, and it puts out a tremendous square of light that is almost equivalent
to being outside, looking at the sun directly.


William Graham


Content - PING: William Graham
Found 21 post(s). Page 1 of 3
| 1 | 2 | 3 |










 
Golfakademie - wahrsagen - DSL - Gourmet Dessert Recipes - Ankauf Silber Und Silbermünzen
Photoshop questions