[SI] Why not?

I am still perplexed why the SI isn't propagated to rec.photo.digital.
Is there really a barrier, or is it inertia?
--
John McWilliams

John McWilliams

Re: [SI] Why not?

Quickly and thoughtlessly written. What I meant to mean (argh!!) was
that it's too "out there" for people with a general photographic
interest to interest many people. Look at the number of entries... I
suppose I should have entered:
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/woods_JMC0021.jpg
But didn't think about it (and it's a couple years old). But it shows
fractals at three scales.
Hey Jim, enter the above, please!
If one has the time and inclination to look. The only one to me in the
bunch that was "fractal like" was Quercus (and now Duncan and possibly
Lindan's) Al's is borderline as to showing it. I'm really not sure if
Bowser and Mardon's qualify as fractals.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Alan Browne

Re: [SI] Why not?

I'm all for it but past proposals to do so were nayed. I occasionally
posted announcements there and elsewehere to get participation up.
I also think that themes (mandates) need to be more accessible and fun
to do. The recent "chrome" was a good one that I didn't have time to
do. The recent fractals is too abstract for that.
Cheers,
Alan.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.